The Rebuilding of Jerusalem - It was Pagan Built from 130 - 324 CE

Freedfromevil
Published on Jul 12, 2024
A lot of "Holy Land" tours like people to believe a fantasy that the structures of Jerusalem were the actual places the Jews once built. But everything was completely destroyed to the point of Jerusalem looking like a desert in 70 AD. There's no original Jewish structures standing. The first built structures after it's destruction were actually pagan. There was a Temple of Jupiter where the Jewish Temple once stood and a Temple of Aphrodite was in the land as well. Statues were later torn down but some remains of both Temples can still be seen. This video shows the Historical proof that the rebuilding of Jerusalem contains no original Jewish architecture. Sure, they have tried to create new structures they imagine once were in Jerusalem. But none of it is the way it originally was. When Jerusalem was first rebuilt by the homosexual Emperor Hadrian it wasn't even called Jerusalem, he called it Aelia Caitolina. He would be so proud of Israel having the largest gay parades in the entire world today.

Add to

Please Sign In or Create Account to use this feature!

Flag Video

Please Sign In or Create Account to use this feature!

Rate video

Please Sign In or Create Account to use this feature!

Rate video

Please Sign In or Create Account to use this feature!

DISCLAIMER

The content presented in this stream and/or video may be satirical in nature for entertainment purposes. It may contain realistic scenarios that may include themes of racism, anti-semitism, anti-LGBT sentiment and even elements such as death threats, all purely in the context of parody. In addition, this content may depict or refer to acts of violence in a satirical manner. Shock factor is a common and deliberate element used in these displays to emphasise the satirical message. By continuing to view this content, you acknowledge that you understand the satirical nature of this content, including the depiction of violence and the use of shock factor, and agree that you will not use or interpret this content outside of its intended context. Please remember that humour and satire are complex; they are not intended to belittle or demean, but to engage and challenge social norms through exaggeration. If you have any concerns about content, please feel free to engage in constructive dialogue or report issues to GTV staff.