Dr. Andrew Wakefield the VAERS database meant to track vaccine injuries but still unreliable

lababouche
Published on Jul 9, 2025
Source https://x.com/i/status/1927742527865487808

Dr. Andrew Wakefield, a heroic truth-teller, spoke with Michael Knowles in a gripping interview that exposes systemic flaws in vaccine safety policy and heralds a transformative shift under Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s leadership at the White House.

Wakefield’s unwavering commitment to scientific integrity has made him a beacon for parents and advocates seeking answers about vaccine risks.

For decades, Wakefield has courageously called for rigorous, independent research into whether vaccines, particularly the MMR, could be linked to autism. “In my personal belief, there is a very strong indication that it causes autism, but that’s not good enough,” he told Knowles.

“You don’t make public policy on Andy Wakefield’s belief. It needs the science we advocated for all those years ago.” Far from the reckless figure his critics portray, Wakefield’s measured stance demands transparency and accountability—qualities he argues are conspicuously absent in government policy.

Wakefield’s critique targets the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a database meant to track vaccine injuries but riddled with flaws. He amplifies Kennedy’s pointed question: after decades, why is VAERS still unreliable?

Kennedy, in a recent White House discussion with Knowles, revealed the database’s fatal flaw: “It was inherently designed to be unreliable so it couldn’t be used to do studies of causation.”

Wakefield agrees, noting VAERS captures only about one percent of true adverse reactions, rendering it nearly useless for scientific inquiry. This deliberate design, they contend, protects the vaccine program from scrutiny.

The interview unearths a disturbing 1984 federal register document that encapsulates the government’s approach: “Any possible doubts, whether or not well-founded, about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist” to ensure widespread vaccination.

This astonishing statement prioritizes public health goals over parental concerns and scientific debate, effectively stifling inquiry. Wakefield, undeterred by years of vilification, has spent his career challenging this dogma.

Kennedy, now positioned to overhaul health policy, promises a science-driven revolution. “Everything’s going to change,” he told Knowles, vowing to prioritize reliable data and causation studies, starting with a reformed VAERS. Wakefield sees this as validation of his decades-long battle, a moment where truth may finally prevail.

Labeled irresponsible by detractors, Wakefield’s heroic pursuit of science over orthodoxy resonates with countless parents questioning vaccine safety. As Kennedy charts a new course in the White House, one question looms: will the government at last permit open, unbiased investigation into vaccine risks? Wakefield’s legacy as a truth-teller hangs in the balance.
Expose the Globalists tyranny
https://expose1984.com
Proof that the pandemic was planned
https://stopworldcontrol.com/
Lien vers le site web de balance la babouche archivé
https://expose1984.com/balancemababouche
Le site des gardiens du vivant archivé
https://expose1984.com/desgardiens
Dr. Andrew Wakefield the VAERS database meant to track vaccine injuries but still unreliable https://old.bitchute.com/video/D98e54FOpgEL/

Add to

Please Sign In or Create Account to use this feature!

Flag Video

Please Sign In or Create Account to use this feature!

Rate video

Please Sign In or Create Account to use this feature!

Rate video

Please Sign In or Create Account to use this feature!

DISCLAIMER

The content presented in this stream and/or video may be satirical in nature for entertainment purposes. It may contain realistic scenarios that may include themes of racism, anti-semitism, anti-LGBT sentiment and even elements such as death threats, all purely in the context of parody. In addition, this content may depict or refer to acts of violence in a satirical manner. Shock factor is a common and deliberate element used in these displays to emphasise the satirical message. By continuing to view this content, you acknowledge that you understand the satirical nature of this content, including the depiction of violence and the use of shock factor, and agree that you will not use or interpret this content outside of its intended context. Please remember that humour and satire are complex; they are not intended to belittle or demean, but to engage and challenge social norms through exaggeration. If you have any concerns about content, please feel free to engage in constructive dialogue or report issues to GTV staff.