9/11 Deprogramming - Part 2 (Critical Thinking)

NineElevenRevisionist
Published on Mar 17, 2023
911 Observable Evidence

A nicely packaged and methodical presentation. Gives a good sense of what happened physically to the WTC complex.

For the truthers it effortlessly demolishes the thermite / nuke / controlled demolition theories.

The Pentagon incident It cannot be a plane – 00:45 to 15:50
Easter eggs – 15:50 to 16:30
Norman Moneta & Dr Van Romero and his Directed Energy Workshop 2000 – 16:30 to 20:34
‘Rethink911’ 2013 – 20:34 to 27:14
Building 7 - 27:15 to 41:20
NIST and Dr Wood suing the NIST contractors – 41:20 to 50:45
Skeptics vs Truthers (The debunking wars) – 50:45 to 01:00:27
The case for REAL planes – 01:00:28 to 01:04:30
Peer review filter C.R.A.P. - 01:04:30 to 01:06:22
Jim Fetzer and his mini - nukes – 01:06:22 to 01:15:32
Culture of lies and the 911 truth industry - 01:15:35 to end

Telegram: https://t.me/Sept11_Deprogramming
Twitter: https://twitter.com/911Revisionist
Substak: https://911revision.substack.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/879905060007964

Category

Share Video

  • 560 x 315
  • 640 x 360
  • 853 x 480
  • 1280 x 720

Add to

Flag Video

Rate video

Rate video

DISCLAIMER

The content presented in this stream and/or video may be satirical in nature for entertainment purposes. It may contain realistic scenarios that may include themes of racism, anti-semitism, anti-LGBT sentiment and even elements such as death threats, all purely in the context of parody. In addition, this content may depict or refer to acts of violence in a satirical manner. Shock factor is a common and deliberate element used in these displays to emphasise the satirical message. By continuing to view this content, you acknowledge that you understand the satirical nature of this content, including the depiction of violence and the use of shock factor, and agree that you will not use or interpret this content outside of its intended context. Please remember that humour and satire are complex; they are not intended to belittle or demean, but to engage and challenge social norms through exaggeration. If you have any concerns about content, please feel free to engage in constructive dialogue or report issues to GTV staff.

Up next