Dr. Daniel Neides Apologizes for Vaccine Ignorance: "I Failed to Give Informed Consent"

lababouche
Published on Jul 7, 2025
Source https://x.com/i/status/1941940107096768940
Apparently this was done in 2017, regarding a flu shot that he was told had no preservatives, but did and made him sick for 48 hours. If he apologised in 2017, then he's awake, and never gave a covid shot. He's on the right side of history.
https://nationalpost.com/news/world/cleveland-clinic-doctor-apologizes-after-rant-against-flu-vaccine-that-left-him-feeling-unwell

Doctor Breaks Down as He Apologizes for Vaccine Ignorance: "I Failed to Give Informed Consent"

Dr. Daniel Neides, a respected educator at Lerner College of Medicine and Case Western Reserve University, has raised urgent concerns about the lack of vaccine education in medical schools.

He reveals a troubling reality: medical students are not taught about vaccine contents, safety records, informed consent, or the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. Instead, they are required to memorize vaccine schedules to pass exams, with no discussion of the nearly $4 billion paid to vaccine-injured patients since 1992.

Neides calls this a failure to provide the fair balance expected in medical practice. Neides also highlights conflicts of interest, noting that providers are often paid to complete vaccine schedules, which may pressure them to prioritize compliance over patient concerns.

Shockingly, patients who question vaccine safety risk being dismissed from medical practices—a practice Neides calls "deplorable and disgusting." He further condemns employers who mandate flu vaccines, citing cases like a father facing job loss just six months from retirement for refusing the shot.

A lack of informed consent is another critical issue. Neides admits that, as a provider, he failed to provide safety information before administering vaccines, only handing out information sheets after the fact. He expresses deep regret for not informing patients about the compensation program or how to report adverse events, apologizing to those he underserved.

Transparency is sorely lacking, Neides argues, as patients reporting vaccine complications are often shamed or dismissed. He contrasts this with standard medical practice: if a patient reports a rash from penicillin, it’s immediately noted as an allergy. Yet, vaccine adverse events are met with skepticism, leaving patients unheard.

Neides’ emotional plea underscores the need for reform in how the medical community handles vaccine education, patient autonomy, and accountability.This is a call to action for transparency, informed consent, and respect for patients’ experiences.
Expose the Globalists tyranny
https://expose1984.com
Proof that the pandemic was planned
https://stopworldcontrol.com/
Lien vers le site web de balance la babouche archivé
https://expose1984.com/balancemababouche
Le site des gardiens du vivant archivé
https://expose1984.com/desgardiens
Dr. Daniel Neides Apologizes for Vaccine Ignorance: "I Failed to Give Informed Consent" " https://old.bitchute.com/video/bMs83bKSi4U9/

Add to

Please Sign In or Create Account to use this feature!

Flag Video

Please Sign In or Create Account to use this feature!

Rate video

Please Sign In or Create Account to use this feature!

Rate video

Please Sign In or Create Account to use this feature!

DISCLAIMER

The content presented in this stream and/or video may be satirical in nature for entertainment purposes. It may contain realistic scenarios that may include themes of racism, anti-semitism, anti-LGBT sentiment and even elements such as death threats, all purely in the context of parody. In addition, this content may depict or refer to acts of violence in a satirical manner. Shock factor is a common and deliberate element used in these displays to emphasise the satirical message. By continuing to view this content, you acknowledge that you understand the satirical nature of this content, including the depiction of violence and the use of shock factor, and agree that you will not use or interpret this content outside of its intended context. Please remember that humour and satire are complex; they are not intended to belittle or demean, but to engage and challenge social norms through exaggeration. If you have any concerns about content, please feel free to engage in constructive dialogue or report issues to GTV staff.