Gas Chambers - The Rumor Of The Century - Part 2 [Vincent Reynouard]

VincentReynouardMirror
Published on Jun 5, 2023
Wuwox: https://www.wuwox.com/c/vincentreynouardmirror
Telegram: https://t.me/vincentreynouardmirror

Chambres à gaz, la rumeur du siècle partie 2 - Gas Chambers, the Rumor of the Century part 2

From: https://archive.org/details/VincentReynouardChambresAGazLaRumeurDuSieclePartie2
All Videos: https://archive.org/details/@didi18?and%5B%5D=subject%3A%22Vincent+Reynouard%22&sort=-publicdate
By Uploader: https://archive.org/search?query=creator%3A%22didi18%22

Chambres à gaz, la rumeur du siècle partie 2 Dans ce deuxième volet, Vincent Reynouard répond à l’argument mille fois entendu: « Mais que faites-vous de tous les témoignages et des tous les aveux concordants ». – S’appuyant sur des documents historiques, il démontre tout d’abord l’effarante crédulité des historiens dès qu’il s’agit du prétendu « Holocauste »; – Invoquant ensuite les « aveux » du SS Paul Waldmann (relatifs à un prétendu meurtre de masse des prisonniers soviétiques à l’aide d’un marteau à pédale) et le retournement opportun de l’ancien commandant de Birkenau Josef Kramer (« il n’y avait pas de chambres à gaz à Auschwitz » dit-il dans son interrogatoire du 20 mai 1945/ »j’ai visité une chambre à gaz à Birkenau » dit-il la veille de son procès), Vincent Reynouard démontre qu’en matière d’aveux, il est possible d’obtenir n’importe quoi de n’importe qui. – L’auteur dévoile ensuite l’affaire d’Alfred Thiefenbacher, cet ancien déporté à Mauthausen habilement coincé par les enquêteurs américains. Il rappelle également le cas de l’ancien chauffeur d’Hitler, Erich Kempka, dont le contre-interrogatoire par le Tribunal de Nuremberg permit de prouver qu’il n’était pas un témoin oculaire. Ces deux faits démontrent que nul ne doit être cru sur parole tant qu’il l’a pas subi un contre-interrogatoire serré. – Enfin, Vincent Reynouard appelle l’attention sur la malhonnêteté flagrante des historiens lorsqu’ils osent encore recourir au faux témoin démasqué K. Gerstein.

Gas Chambers, the Rumor of the Century part 2 In this second part, Vincent Reynouard answers the argument heard a thousand times: "But what do you do with all the testimonies and all matching confessions". 1) Based on historical documents, he first of all demonstrates the astounding credulity of historians when it comes to the alleged "Holocaust"; 2. Invoking then the "confessions" of SS Paul Waldmann (relating to the alleged mass murder of Soviet prisoners using a pedal hammer) and the timely turnaround of the former commander of Birkenau Josef Kramer ( "there was no gas chambers at Auschwitz," he said in his interrogation of May 20, 1945 /"I visited a gas chamber at Birkenau" he said the day before his trial), Vincent Reynouard demonstrates that in terms of confessions, it is possible to get anything from anyone. 3. The author then unveils the case of Alfred Thiefenbacher, this former deportee to Mauthausen cleverly cornered by US investigators. He also recalled the case of the former driver of Hitler, Erich Kempka, whose cross-examination by the Nuremberg Tribunal allowed to prove that he was not an eyewitness. These two facts show that no one should be blindly believed as long as he has not been cross-examined tightly . 4. Finally, Vincent Reynouard draws attention to the blatant dishonesty when historians still dare to use the false unmasked witness K. Gerstein.

Add to

Please Sign In or Create Account to use this feature!

Flag Video

Please Sign In or Create Account to use this feature!

Rate video

Please Sign In or Create Account to use this feature!

Rate video

Please Sign In or Create Account to use this feature!

DISCLAIMER

The content presented in this stream and/or video may be satirical in nature for entertainment purposes. It may contain realistic scenarios that may include themes of racism, anti-semitism, anti-LGBT sentiment and even elements such as death threats, all purely in the context of parody. In addition, this content may depict or refer to acts of violence in a satirical manner. Shock factor is a common and deliberate element used in these displays to emphasise the satirical message. By continuing to view this content, you acknowledge that you understand the satirical nature of this content, including the depiction of violence and the use of shock factor, and agree that you will not use or interpret this content outside of its intended context. Please remember that humour and satire are complex; they are not intended to belittle or demean, but to engage and challenge social norms through exaggeration. If you have any concerns about content, please feel free to engage in constructive dialogue or report issues to GTV staff.